Category Archives: War crimes

Hot gay Action And Unilateral Decisions

Click below for soundtracking

N35t – Decidedly gay

Last fall i had an idea to begin an all-out viral meme offensive against the worst and most directly involved offenders of the military-industrial complex. This meant targeting the troops themselves, the sacrosanct First 4 Columns, the Second Estate, Our Brave Heroes™. Not a popular target. This is why i am the scourge of American Leftism™ (in addition to my actually being Leftist): i call Bullshit on the alleged non-culpability of the willing tool used in commision of a crime. Guns don’t kill people, but people who opt for a career as Gun-for-Hire do, and should be vilfied for this selfish and elementarially unethical descision.Fuck the Second Estate; who are more an extension of the oligarchy “Nobility” that usurped this eponymous entitlement every day, who betray the class whose bodies fill their rank and file, who use the myth of patriotic bravery to disguise cowardly acts of thugish recklessness. Murder is murder, rape is rape, inhumanity is inhumane by identity alone regardless of blanket apologies or oxymoronic reasoning proffered by bureaucracies to justify sanctioned violence. There is no such thing as a “pre-emptive strike” or a “defensive incursion”; there is only an attack or a defence.BTW, “defense” is spelled “defence” in English, due to the “c=s and s=z if followed by e” rule of phonetics. “Defence”, as in “of (de) border guard (fence)”. The spread of the misspelling meme has me a tad concerned.I realize that blanket blaming all military professionals is perhaps unproductive, but it is nonetheless a logical ethical argument. Consider it collective punishment. The Troops™ can be Gaza to my Israel. My chosen clusterbomb: derision of manhood by allegation of homosexuality. First objective for surgical strike: The SOA.

US Foreign Policy Is A Rape Joke: Take 4

open playlist in new windowThe School of the Americas, now known as the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Co-operation (WHISC, onomonopaediac if one considers the sounds of sweeping something under a rug) has been the public face on US-sponsored state terrorism since the Bay of Pigs. Operation Condor, the Biafra Wars, Pol Pot, Los Bros Hussain and of course the Taliban all trace their sense and insensibilities to this little piece of publicly funded Hell in Florida. Senior thesis work and internships are done across the water at Guantanimo Bay. This involves explaining the utility of rape as a deterrent to whistleblowers, organizers, and participants in democracy.So our target demographic is men from 18-34 with social integration dysfuntia who enjoy physical activity in close proximity to other men; and who need to be taught why they should rape women even when previously given blank checks for perpetrating every sort of vile violation on other humans. This implies that the average cadet at this school needs encouragement to violate women, in fact needs specific mission-critical instruction as to why they shouldn’t just concentrate on the testicular techniques they had so eagerly soaked up in the classes prior.These guys are gay.Not “Gay”, uppercase, which is an entitlement of honor meaning that the person, place, thing or nouned verb in question is Fabulous and/or homosexual. The American Boys’ Schoolboys are “gay”, lowercase, which is a term of derision originating with straight men directed at people, places, things or nouned verbs which we find to be a waste of time. Like a caucus, a perfect example of an event where tasteless idiots clammor ass-over-cockholster for the opportunity to wear a styrofoam straw hat and have red white and blue bunting pounded into their urethrae by a surrogate SuperDelegate™ while voicing the preference that their Party Boss has told them to chose in the hotly bid-upon cakewalk of Deusche or Turd Sandwich.Fucking gay, is what that waste of time is.So is the action of giving it lip service. So is every man and woman working at Gitmo.I ran the semantics past a friend who i consider quite an intellect, a lab manager from another state who has been a proud member of the homosexual communitee since…well, since right about now. He’s Gay, sure, but he has a life and shit; perhaps i shouldn’t have made him spokesmench for all of homosexual America but i did and i’m not really sorry about it since he saw where i was coming from, understood what the use of “gay” to a straight man meant as far as he could, was intrigued by the use of “Gay” as a proper entitlement (like “Hispanic” or “White”) and by the idea of retooling a word for the mutual empowerment of opposed demographics by fully schisming it into a proper noun and a common gerund (“Black” vs “black”). He said “OK.” srry.So that’s why the above song got released. No offense meant to True Gays, Poms, or WTFE; and i don’t mean to lump allzy’all in with the likes of Dubya, either. You’re all Golden to me; Know This.Moving on. Turns out that Leap Year worked a number on Black History Month. Now it’s Black History Year, and i’m the Cracka what’s gonna make it stick.

Aye To Eyemran

open playlist in new window Saint Sri Georgie “Old Fuck” Carlin is back, of course, with new shtick.

Sri Carlin: It’s Bad For Ya

open playlist in new window Oh, yeah. It’s Black History Year, All Year. Did i mention that?

Eddie Griffin: Dysfunctional Family

open playlist in new window That is all from Central at this time-code. Remember to enjoy yourselves, steal from work and slack off on Company Time.

Advertisements

Special Victimizing Units Education Management

Sorry if i seem to be withholding on the next installment of the Rape Joke That Is January Primaries, but…well, i’ve been gettin’ some more some than usual-ally some-sum.

Some what, prithee mayhaps?

Massaging The Glass Teat

open playlist in new window

Some focal examplary specifics for our coming Green Man Memorial Enclosure Expo:

That’s OUR Surplus, Slicke!

open playlist in new window

Enclosure is Thier™ Process. Some humans do require a kennel, to be sure. Even some dogs who never personally never ate chickens and weren’t running with a pack on a given hypothetical night still, perhaps, need to be denied access to the Public Commons.

FunctInstruct: HowTo Insure Denial of Parole

open playlist in new window

That’s right, Charlie can’t surf. Never killed anyone, wouldn’t even be culpable as a Driver or for Aiding and Abbetting.
I still say i agree with the panel. Dude’s a liability. The rest of the Population has free, unrestricted access to the Resources of the Commons as a basic Civil Right, yes?

HELLS NO.

That ain’t right.

Bob’s Alright

open playlist in new window

I know we’re NOT a Democracy and all, and it appears as if this is by your Choice, BTW; but still…

DemoKrazy


open playlist in new window

…am i supposed to believe that you approve of continued ineptitude and…well, just general impotence and faggotry in the more than merely lackluster performance of the CADS (Civilian Advisory Death Squads) who get rubber-stamp certified by the School of the Americas? Now that it’s changed name-charters to…WTF…St Mary’s Rape College? Shit, i can’t remember right now…BRB…

Boy’s Life



open playlist in new window

…W/e, i’ll look it up later. Point is, they’re all fucking sickos, yeah, but they’re also creepy, closeted fags from pussy neighborhoods. They suck. I think we should’ve cut our losses after the Bay of Pigs and outsourced to Mongol or Cossack thugs. Oh wait, the Soviets. Right. Gotcha. Not a problem now; it’s a Brave New Globalism. Look! There’s a Hun below!

Žižek-a-lackin’



open playlist in new window

Oh yeah. One more thing: Revolutionary Theory Is Neither.

Happy New World Rape Joke.

Rape Joke, Take 1.A Rape Joke.Here’s some nicely B0t’d spam from this morning.

 

  • — “FU(K Buddy” wrote: ———————————Enable Image will tellyou everythingcorner, sweaty palmed, nervous with anticipation, I couldnt see himbut I could hear the boisterous laughter ofthe audience. There must haveFrom: “Celia Watkins” Add to Address Book Add Mobile AlertTo: shvaundra@yahoo.comSubject: when to stop bloggingDate: Thu, 2 Jan 2008 16:08:32 +0200patterns look inHallo. How are you? Email me at Megan@UsOldGlory.info only. I am usingmy friend’s email to write this. I am female. To see some pictures ofme.the academy’s report. hear if you would videos or older childrenconsequently not protected
  • The Aristocrats, and Other Rape Jokes

    open playlist in new window 

    Massaging The Glass Teat

    open playlist in new window

    The Duke, The Clown, The Kids & US

    open playlist in new window

    CCC Calls Truthers™ “Nuts”; Self Implied

    All Our Base Are Also Belong To You
    ~ Up ~ ~ Charm ~ ~ Strange ~ ~ Top ~

    ~ Bottom ~ ~ Will ~ ~ Down ~

    Candidate’s Koa: Of course they, and you, are. They expect a do-over in an undemocratic society. They are unrealistic to the point of fanaticism. They are Love itself; for the Truthers™ Are America. Hell’s Bellez, Shirt-Dipper, allzy’all are driving me nuts just reposting this insanity. It’s getting outright HP Lovecraft Country up in the places.

    CCC Calls Truthers™ “Nuts”; Self Implied

    From georgewashington.blogspot.com

    [Send the following email to everyone you know, so that even people who get all of their news from msnabcnnfox, which censors 9/11 information, get a dose of truth. There are almost 100 million people who have already woken up to at least some of the truth about 9/11, so we can spread this message virally … ]

    9/11 Truthers are Nuts!

    Or are they?

    Let’s take a look:

    MILITARY LEADERS

    Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t hunt” (bio)

    Director of the U.S. “Star Wars” space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions (Col. Robert Bowman) stated that 9/11 was an inside job. He also said:

    If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot..I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what theyfve changed them to..if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason!

    U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director, decorated with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal (Capt. Daniel Davis) stated:

    “there is no way that an aircraft . . . would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control … Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a ‘conspiracy Theory’ does not change the truth. It seems, ‘Something is rotten in the State.’ “

    President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguished Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals (Lt. Col. Jeff Latas) is a member of a group which doubts the government’s version of 9/11

    U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said “We’ve never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve seen that for a long time.”

    Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official (Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski) finds various aspects of 9/11 suspicious

    Lieutenant colonel, 24-year Air Force career, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute (Lt. Colonel Steve Butler) said “Of course Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism.”

    Two-Star general (Major General Albert Stubbelbine) questions the attack on the Pentagon

    U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATOfs Tactical Leadership Program, with a 20-year Air Force career (Lt. Colonel Guy S. Razer) said the following:

    “I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government ….

    Those of us in the military took an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”. Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.

    We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!”

    U.S. Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, a fighter pilot with over 300 combat missions flown and a 21-year Marine Corps career (Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford) believes that 9/11 was an inside job, and said:

    “This isn’t about party, it isn’t about Bush Bashing. It’s about our country, our constitution, and our future. …

    Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away.

    If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who know factual information that directly contradicts the official report and who want explanations from those who hold the keys to our government, and have motive, means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11, but you are too lazy or fearful, or … to check into the facts yourself, what does that make you? ….

    Are you afraid that you will learn the truth and you can’t handle it? …”

    U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot (Commander Ralph Kolstad) who questions the official account of 9/11 and is calling for a new investigation, says “When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story”.

    The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibility

    Additionally, numerous military leaders from allied governments have questioned 9/11, such as:

    Canadian Minister of Defense, the top military leader of Canada (Paul Hellyer)

    Assistant German Defense Minister (Andreas Von Bulow)

    Commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy (Anatoli Kornukov)

    Chief of staff of the Russian armed forces (General Leonid Ivashov)

    INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS

    A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said gI think at simplest terms, therefs a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a jokeh, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.

    A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill Christison) said gI now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … All three [buildings that were destroyed in the World Trade Center] were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings before 9/11.” (and see this).

    20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer (David Steele) stated that “9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war”, and it was probably an inside job (see Customer Review dated October 7, 2006).

    A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, whose Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called “perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle Easth, and astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that“the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job .

    The Division Chief of the CIAfs Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 – 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 – 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said “The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup.”

    Professor of History and International Relations, University of Maryland. Former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency. Former military attacheL in China. 21-year career in U.S. Army Intelligence (Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army)

    questions the government’s version of the events of 9/11.

    The head of all U.S. intelligence, the Director of National Intelligence (Mike McConnel) said “9/11 should have and could have been prevented”

    9/11 COMMISSIONERS

    The 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn’t bother to tell the American people (free subscription required).

    Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission (Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton) now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.

    9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only “the first draft” of history.

    9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”

    9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”

    Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”.

    The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry, said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”

    SCIENTISTS

    A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed “does not match the available facts” and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition

    A world-renowned scientist, recipient of the National Medal of Science, America’s highest honor for scientific achievement (Dr. Lynn Margulis) said:

    I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken.

    The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering, with more than 25 years experience in fire research and its applications, and is a professor in the Department of Fire Protection Engineering at the University of Maryland (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. … I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable.”

    Former Director for Research, Director for Aeronautical Projects, and Flight Research Program Manager for NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center, who holds masters degrees in both physics and engineering (Dwain A. Deets) says:

    The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Centers on 9/11].”

    A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of physics from a top university, and a former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects (Dr. Steven E. Jones) stated that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition

    A U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities (Dr. Crockett Grabbe) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition

    An expert on demolition (Bent Lund) said that the trade centers were brought down with explosives (in Danish)

    A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded

    A safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority (Dr. Heikki Kurttila) stated regarding WTC 7 that “The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition.”

    A 13-year professor of metallurgical engineering at a U.S. university, with a PhD in materials engineering, a former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member (Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn), is calling for a new investigation of 9/11

    A Danish professor of chemistry (Dr. Niels Harrit) said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, “WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don’t have to be a woodcutter to grasp this” (translated)

    A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science at a university concluded (Dr. Bruce R. Henry) that the Twin Towers “were brought down by planted explosives.”

    A professor of mathematics (Gary Welz) said “The official explanation that I’ve heard doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the concrete was pulverized”

    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS

    A prominent engineer with 55 years experience, in charge of the design of hundreds of major building projects including high rise offices, former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council (Marx Ayres) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition (see also this)

    Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here)

    Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas (and see this)

    Dennis Kollar, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin

    Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)

    Haluk Akol, Structural Engineer and architect (ret.)

    William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont Technical College

    An architect, member of the American Institute of Architects, who has been a practicing architect for 20 years and has been responsible for the production of construction documents for numerous steel-framed and fire-protected buildings for uses in many different areas, including education, civic, rapid transit and industrial use (Richard Gage) disputes the claim that fire and airplane damage brought down the World Trade Centers and believes there is strong evidence of controlled demolition (many other architects who question 9/11 are listed here)

    LEGAL SCHOLARS

    Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Former Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation; former Professor of Aviation, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering and Aviation and Professor of Public Policy, Ohio State University (Mary Schiavo) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois, Champaign; a leading practitioner and advocate of international law; responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention; served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia- Herzegovina at the World Court, with a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University (Dr. Francis Boyle) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Former prosecutor in the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the U.S. Justice Department and a key member of Attorney General Bobby Kennedyfs anti-corruption task force; former assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois (J. Terrence “Terry” Brunner) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Professor Emeritus, International Law, Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University; in 2001 served on the three-person UN Commission on Human Rights for the Palestine Territories, and previously, on the Independent International Commission on Kosovo (Richard Falk) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Bessie Dutton Murray Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus and Director, Center for Human Rights, University of Iowa; Fellow, World Academy of Art and Science. Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American Journal of International Law (Burns H. Weston) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Former president of the National Lawyers Guild (C. Peter Erlinder), who signed a petition calling for a real investigation into 9/11. And see petition.

    Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Troy University; associate General Counsel, National Association of Federal Agents; Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs, responsible for the internal integrity and security for areas encompassing nine states and two foreign locations; former Federal Sky Marshall; 27-year U.S. Customs career (Mark Conrad) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Professor of Law, University of Freiburg; former Minister of Justice of West Germany (Horst Ehmke) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Director of Academic Programs, Institute for Policy and Economic Development, University of Texas, El Paso, specializing in executive branch secrecy policy, governmental abuse, and law and bureaucracy; former U.S. Army Signals Intelligence officer; author of several books on law and political theory (Dr. William G. Weaver) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Famed trial attorney (Gerry Spence) questions the government’s version of 9/11.

    Former Instructor of Criminal Trial Practice, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley 11-year teaching career. Retired Chief Assistant Public Defender, Contra Costa County, California 31-year career (William Veale) said:

    “When you grow up in the United States, there are some bedrock principles that require concerted effort to discard. One is the simplest: that our leaders are good and decent people whose efforts may occasionally warrant criticism but never because of malice or venality… But one grows up. … And with the lawyer’s training comes the reliance on evidence and the facts that persuade… After a lot of reading, thought, study, and commiseration, I have come to the conclusion that the attacks of 9/11 were, in their essence, an inside job perpetrated at the highest levels of the U S government.”

    MEMBERS OF CONGRESS

    Current U.S. Senator (Patrick Leahy) states “The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?”

    Current Republican Congressman (Ron Paul) states that “we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on”

    Current Democratic Congressman (Dennis Kucinich) hints that we aren’t being told the truth about 9/11

    Former Democratic Senator (Mike Gravel) states that he supports a new 9/11 investigation and that we don’t know the truth about 9/11

    Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee (Curt Weldon) has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job

    FAMILY MEMBERS AND HEROIC FIRST RESPONDERS

    A common criticism of those who question 9/11 is that they are being “disrespectful to the victims and their families”.

    However, half of the victim’s families believe that 9/11 was an inside job (according to the head of the largest 9/11 family group, Bill Doyle) (and listen to this interview). Many family and friends of victims not only support the search for 9/11 truth, but they demand it (please ignore the partisan tone). See also this interview.

    Indeed, it has now become so clear that the 9/11 Commission was a whitewash that the same 9/11 widows who called for the creation of the 9/11 Commission are now demanding a NEW investigation (see also this video).

    And dying heroes, soon-to-be victims themselves, the first responders who worked tirelessly to save lives on and after 9/11, say that controlled demolition brought down the Twin Towers and that a real investigation is necessary.

    PSYCHIATRISTS AND PSYCHOLOGISTS

    Finally, those who attack people who question the government’s version of 9/11 as “crazy” may wish to review the list of mental health professionals who have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is false:

    Psychiatrist Carol S. Wolman, MD

    Psychiatrist E. Martin Schotz

    Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, as well as Radiology, at Duke University Medical Center D. Lawrence Burk, Jr., MD

    Board of Governors Distinguished Service Professor of Psychology and Associate Dean of the Graduate School at Ruters University Barry R. Komisaruk

    Professor of Psychology at University of New Hampshire William Woodward

    Professor of Psychology at University of Essex Philip Cozzolino

    Professor of Psychology at Goddard College Catherine Lowther

    Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California Institute of Integral Studies Ralph Metzner

    Professor of Psychology at Rhodes University Mike Earl-Taylor

    Retired Professor of Psychology at Oxford University Graham Harris

    Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Nebraska and licensed Psychologist Ronald Feintech

    Ph.D. Clinical Neuropsychologist Richard Welser

    THOUSANDS OF OTHERS

    The roster above is only a sample. There are too many Ph.D. scientists and engineers, architects, military and intelligence officials, politicians, legal scholars and other highly-credible people who question 9/11 — literally thousands — to list in one place. Here are a few additional people to consider:

    The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission

    Former air traffic controller, who knows the flight corridor which the two planes which hit the Twin Towers flew “like the back of my hand” and who handled two actual hijackings (Robin Hordon) says that 9/11 could not have occurred as the government says, and that planes can be tracked on radar even when their transponders are turned off (also, listen to this interview)

    Perhaps “the premiere collapse expert in the country”, who 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer referred to as a “very, very respected expert on building collapse”, the head of the New York Fire Department’s Special Operations Command and the most highly decorated firefighter in its NYFD history, who had previously “commanded rescue operations at many difficult and complex disasters, including the Oklahoma City Bombing, the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing, and many natural disasters worldwide” thought that the collapse of the South Tower was caused by bombs, because the collapse of the building was too even to have been caused by anything else (pages 5-6).

    Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who’s who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11

    Former FBI agent (Robert Wright) says “The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.”

    Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that “very serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been”, that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there’s enough evidence to justify a new, “hard-hitting” investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath

    Former FBI translator, who the Department of Justice’s Inspector General and several senators have called extremely credible (free subscription required) (Sibel Edmonds), said “If they were to do real investigations we would see several significant high level criminal prosecutions in this country. And that is something that they are not going to let out. And, believe me; they will do everything to cover this up”. She also is leaning towards the conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job.

    Hmmm . . . maybe 9/11 Truthers are not nuts.

    Justice as a Function of Time/Distance

    The King can do no wrong, or at least can’t be tried for it; as that may divulge sensitive data critical to His Inteligence Work™. Which is so brilliant. Although domesticly His Excellency’s drooling lackies seem to think that IEDs could bloom in shopping malls near YourTown anyday now. Which is most probably no doubt scheduled, but will remain unacted on. See, it’s the End of 3rd Quarter, Autumn of a year prior to a presidential election. Cheney and Dubya will have to light the fuse themselves, and they’d better hurry. It seems that Time is about to become a Distance, and this will probably sting a little.


    Abu You Too
    Uploaded by _cVc_

    25hz
    600 X 491

    Kundaliza

    code:

    …And Now, The Other News.

    This is the B-Side to the previous nicey-nice post of food and chuckles.

    Aljazeera English Special Reports


    open playlist in new window

    Iraq: The hidden facts


    open playlist in new window

    OK, shake it off with Louis CK.

    Lucky LouisVille

    open playlist in new window

    Pounding Sand

    Soundtracking In A New World Window by Outkast
    Fair Friday morning t’ ye’all, fellow Citizen Workers. I spent a little time last night between night tremors updating the Operation: Enduring GangRape Player. I even threw in a very touching vid from a soldier of his buddy playing football with some kids in Tukrit (or some backlot in LA, can’t recall which). I felt it provided a good countertensioning between the videos on women prisoner treatment and the friendly fire POV snuff. The new opener is “Guernica In Iraq”, an AMV from the WarFan communitee.
    Renting: It’s A War Thang, Baby

    code:

    RE; FF POV: In all fairness to the US aviator(s) involved in the above archived incident in which a British convoy was introduced to The Lightening Round, the fault clearly lies with C&C. The guy asked his wingman to confirm, and then nagged him to double back on it, then re-confirmed twice with the tower. They twice (at least) erroneously reported no coalition activity or presence in the area, chiming in just after his second run. Sounds to me like he felt it coming and did his best to avoid it; the way he cracks when they describe the “yellow cabs” of the UK armour he had just vapourised smacks of deja vous.

    Besides, this is BP’s war. Fuck the Redcoats. If they pulled more shifts in the air and drove like White Folks they wouldn’t have to duck so much.